press release
Feb. 21, 2012, 8:50 a.m. EST
Mutual Fund Shareholders are Losing $10 Billion a Year Due to Unequal Pricing That's Hurting Many Retirees, Charges Freedom Watch Attorney Larry Klayman

NEW YORK, Feb. 21, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ --
One of America's scrappiest attorneys and human rights activists, Larry
Klayman, today took legal aim at a bedrock industry on Wall
Street--mutual funds.
Klayman charges that unfair pricing policies of most mutual funds are
costing investors, many of them seniors living on fixed income, more
than $10 billion a year. "The industry better equalize its pricing or
risk a lawsuit," he said.
"The playing field needs to be level so investors aren't paying
differently like airline passengers do according to when they book
flights. New mutual fund purchasers and those liquidating mutual fund
shares have an unfair price advantage over existing shareholders.
"New shareholders are being partially subsidized by existing
shareholders and regulators don't seem to mind an unequal sharing of the
stock brokerage fees that mutual funds incur from ongoing buying and
selling of portfolio securities."
According to Klayman, long-term shareholders also are bearing costs
caused by frequent trading and market timing by short-term investors.
As money is shifted into and out of a fund by a shareholder engaging in
frequent trading, a fund incurs costs for buying and selling securities,
resulting in increased brokerage and administrative costs. These costs
are born by all fund shareholders, including the long-term investors who
do not generate them. Frequent trading also interferes with an
advisor's ability to efficiently manage the fund, he added.
Researchers have proposed a remedy that is elegantly simple to apply called the Sacks Equalization Model (
www.sacksmodel.com ), a patented algorithm designed to level the mutual fund investment field.
In their research paper, "A New Method For Computing Mutual Fund NAV In
Light Of Liquidity-Induced Transaction Costs," Professors Miles
Livingston of the University of Florida and David Rakowski of Southern
Illinois University Carbondale, said the model takes into account net
value (NAV) of the mutual fund and accumulated stock brokerage fees.
The accumulated commission fees are then added to the net asset value
per share prior to purchase of shares and subtracted from the net asset
value per share prior to the liquidation of the shares, thereby leveling
the field. And those monies flow back into the fund for the benefit of
all shareholders.
Moreover this solves the problem of maintaining the true asset value for
existing shareholders when there are rapid share liquidations, thereby
protecting the true asset value of remaining shareholders and reducing
operating costs making mutual funds from .5% to 1% more profitable per
year.
The model was developed by retired stockbroker Seymour Sacks.
Klayman, who founded the public advocacy group Judicial Watch, attained
notoriety filing lawsuits against the Clinton and Bush administrations,
and more recently, as the founder of Freedom Watch, he sued the Supreme
Leader, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard
and the Islamic Republic of Iran for human rights violations and crimes
against humanity. The case is headed for trial on April 6, 2012 in
Washington, D.C. He also has cases pending concerning Obamacare and
other matters of public interest and importance.
Klayman is a former prosecutor in the Justice Department and was on the
trial team that succeeded in breaking up the telephone monopoly of
AT&T. Klayman has authored the books Fatal Neglect and Whores: Why
and How I Came to Fight the Establishment, and writes a weekly column
for the conservative news website WorldNetDaily. On the NBC series The
West Wing, John Diehl played a character patterned after Klayman called
"Harry Klaypool."
For more information about Klayman or the Model, contact amazzone@transmediagroup.com.
These opinions are not my opinions and are not meant to influence any decisions about buying or selling and products.
These opinions are not my opinions and are not meant to influence any decisions about buying or selling and products.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome your comments